Research

Do EMA crossover signals work?

An EMA crossover fires when the 20-day exponential moving average crosses the 50-day. We sent these signals in our first version, then tested them properly. Here is what happened.

SignalTradesNet per tradevs randomVerdict
EMA 20/50 death cross536+0.2%+1.0%Beat random entries
EMA 20/50 golden cross538+0.4%-0.7%No edge over random

24 markets (crypto, US stocks, forex, gold, oil), 2017–2026. Entries at the next open, 1 ATR stop, 2 ATR target, 10-day limit, costs of 0.03–0.15% per side. "vs random" compares with random entries in the same markets and direction using the same exits; a bearish signal can beat random shorts in a rising market and still lose money. Hypothetical results have inherent limitations.

What we use instead

Two rules that held up on data they were not chosen on: buying sharp pullbacks (RSI(2) under 10) in stocks and crypto that are above their 200-day average, and trading 20-day breakouts in crypto.

See the rules, backtest and live record →

Questions

Do EMA crossover signals work?

Not on their own, in our test. Across 24 markets since 2017, using the alert's stop and target and realistic costs, the EMA crossover signals we tested did not make money compared with random entries in the same markets.

How was this tested?

Each signal was replayed day by day using only data available at the time, entered at the next open, exited at a 1 ATR stop, a 2 ATR target or after 10 days, and compared with thousands of random entries using the same exits. Results are hypothetical.

What does Vantum use instead?

Two rules that held up on data they were not chosen on: buying sharp pullbacks (RSI(2) under 10) in stocks and crypto that are above their 200-day average, and trading 20-day breakouts in crypto.

Get the next trade in time to act on it

Pro sends each entry as the daily close confirms it and an exit alert when it's time to close. $19/month after a 7-day free trial. Free accounts see every trade 24 hours later.